how much alcohol and valium is lethal valium online no prescription best substitute for valium

10 pastillas de valium buy valium online can i take half of a valium

tramadol to ease suboxone withdrawal buy tramadol cod cross reaction between morphine and tramadol

can tramadol be taken with tylenol 3 tramadol 50 mg apo-tramadol sr 150 mg

tramadol en colombia cheap tramadol online tramadol paracГ©tamol actavis france

can you use tramadol for headaches buy tramadol online no prescription tramadol 200 mg tropfen

xanax 1 mg color xanax 2mg general practitioner prescribe xanax

can lyrica and ambien be taken together zolpidem no prescription ambien safety in pregnancy

can i take valium with warfarin buy valium online cheap how many valium would kill me

xanax uykusuzluk buy cheap xanax smoking xanax foil

‘judges’ Tagged Posts

After tumultuous Kavanaugh listening to, swing-vote senators weigh decide’s destiny: ‘It is a powerful one’

Following an explosive and, at occasions, extremely emotional day of testimony earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee, all eyes turned to a n...


Following an explosive and, at occasions, extremely emotional day of testimony earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee, all eyes turned to a number of key swing-vote senators who remained outwardly undecided on Supreme Court docket nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s destiny late Thursday.

After the listening to, reasonable Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowksi, R-Alaska, in addition to Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. and Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., huddled to debate the nomination, Fox Information confirmed. 

They talked for roughly 30 minutes earlier than a GOP convention assembly Thursday night forward of Friday’s deliberate Judiciary Committee vote on whether or not to suggest Kavanaugh’s affirmation to the complete Senate.

In the meantime, in a significant enhance to Kavanaugh’s bid, Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who has incessantly sparred with President Trump, introduced he would assist the nominee Thursday night time.

“Whereas each people supplied compelling testimony, nothing that has been offered corroborates the allegation,” Corker wrote in an announcement, referring to Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing him of sexually assaulting her greater than three many years in the past. (Ford initially advised The Washington Submit she was attacked within the “mid-1980s,” and claimed in July the date was within the “early 1980s,” however she testified Thursday the episode occured someday in 1982).


Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, a member of the Judiciary Committee, advised Fox Information after the convention assembly that adopted the listening to Thursday, “I believe we’re going to go forward. I fear about each one in all these votes.”

And Flake, who additionally sits on the Judiciary Committee, advised Fox Information: “It’s a troublesome one. She supplied good testimony, and so did he.”

“For those who’re making an allegation, you need there to be some corroboration,” he added. “The place is the burden? It’s like impeachment. You don’t know.”

Republicans, together with President Trump, have confused that not one of the sexual misconduct allegations towards Kavanaugh made within the final a number of days has any first-hand corroboration.

Requested whether or not extra time or investigating would assist, as Democrats advised repeatedly on Thursday, Flake appeared to reject the concept.

“The place does this begin, and the place does it finish?” he requested. “Extra time, extra ludicrous allegations. What does that do to the accused?”

“It’s a troublesome one. She supplied good testimony, and so did he.”

– Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake

Kavanaugh, sometimes in tears, emphasised on Thursday that the barrage of threats and uncorroborated accusations towards him had taken a everlasting toll on his household and repute.

Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Jerry Moran, R-Kan., introduced they’d vote to verify Kavanaugh after the listening to.

There have been indications late Thursday that different essential senators remained undecided. It isn’t essential for Kavanaugh to safe the bulk approval of the Judiciary Committee to be able to advance to the complete Senate and be confirmed; in 1991, Clarence Thomas was not beneficial by the committee earlier than finally turning into a justice.

“There have been no choices,” Manchin reportedly stated exterior the listening to room. “There are some issues that folks have, and we’re going to attempt to shut the loop.”


Republicans maintain a slim 51-49 majority within the Senate, and may solely afford one defection of their bid to verify Kavanaugh, assuming they safe no Democratic votes.

After hours of testimony from Kavanaugh and Ford, Manchin stated merely, “each witnesses had been credible,” based on CNN.

Fox Information has realized that Republicans’ tentative plan is to carry a closing affirmation vote on Kavanaugh earlier than the complete Senate someday subsequent week.

On Thursday morning, Collins voiced reservations about transferring ahead on Kavanaugh’s affirmation with out issuing a subpoena to his buddy Mark Decide, who Ford claimed was within the room when he allegedly assaulted her within the 1980s.

Murkowksi was photographed huddling with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Capitol Hill earlier within the day, sparking a flurry of hypothesis on social media.

Collins and Murkowski will not be on the Judiciary Committee, so they won’t take part within the deliberate vote Friday morning.

Flake did not ask Kavanaugh any questions through the listening to. As an alternative, he opted to provide a common assertion with out committing firmly by some means on his nomination. Flake beforehand had insisted that Ford be allowed to testify earlier than an up-or-down vote on Kavanaugh.


In an obvious effort to attraction to senators on the fence, in addition to to clear his title and unload on what he described as a deeply unfair and partisan course of, Kavanaugh deserted a lot of his ready remarks to blast the proceedings as a “shame” and a “circus.”

He later sparred with Democratic senators as they questioned him, saying his household and repute had been “destroyed” by the uncorroborated claims instantly introduced towards him. The listening to ended Thursday night after eight hours price of testimony from Ford and Kavanaugh.

“This affirmation course of has change into a nationwide shame,” he advised the committee. “The Structure offers the Senate an necessary function within the affirmation course of. However you’ve gotten changed advise and consent with search and destroy.”

“This affirmation course of has change into a nationwide shame.”

– Supreme Court docket nominee Brett Kavanaugh

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., additionally let unfastened on his Democratic colleagues through the proceedings, which he known as a “sham” listening to to probe sexual assault allegations towards Kavanaugh, in a show that earned him reward from the White Home and scorn from the left.

Graham alleged the Democrats’ dealing with was all about politics.

“That is essentially the most unethical sham since I have been in politics,” a visibly indignant Graham stated from the dais whereas pointing at Democratic senators. “And in the event you actually wished to know the reality, you positive as hell would not have performed what you’ve got performed to this man.”


Ford first introduced her allegations to Feinstein’s consideration in July, however the California Democrat did not disclose the allegations to her Senate colleagues or federal authorities till days earlier than an important Judiciary Committee vote on Kavanaugh’s affirmation earlier this month. Republicans have accused Feinstein’s workplace of compromising Ford’s anonymity by sitting on the allegations till she may deploy them in a leak for optimum political achieve.

In a dramatic second Thursday, Feinstein claimed underneath questioning from Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, R-Tex., that the complete textual content of Ford’s letter had by no means leaked, although The Washington Submit reported earlier this month that it had obtained the complete textual content of the letter. Feinstein advised Ford’s buddies, not her staffers, had leaked details about the letter.


Not one of the witnesses Ford has recognized as being current on the occasion the place she was allegedly assaulted — together with Leland Ingham Keyser, her finest buddy on the time — have stated they keep in mind something concerning the episode. Requested about Keyser’s assertion, Ford advised on Thursday her buddy was having medical points.

In her testimony earlier within the day, Ford — who had advised Feinstein in her July letter that the occasion included “included me and four others” — modified the tally, and advised senators that there have been 4 boys there, along with her feminine buddy. (Ford had beforehand advised her therapist in 2012 there have been 4 boys within the room throughout her alleged assault, and later stated her therapist had inaccurately recorded her statements).

In an August notice Ford wrote prematurely of a polygraph examination she took on the route of her legal professionals, she maintained that “there have been four boys and a few ladies” on the occasion, once more contradicting her letter to Feinstein in July.

Ford additionally claimed she had been unaware of committee Republicans’ affords, which had been communicated publicly and to her attorneys, to fly out to California to fulfill along with her in order that they may expedite the hearings. 

Fox Information’ Chad Pergram, Alex Pappas and Andrew O’Reilly contributed to this report.

Gregg Re is an editor for Fox Information. Observe him on Twitter @gregg_re.

Mark Choose’s former girlfriend is able to speak to FBI and Judiciary Committee, her lawyer says


Opinion author

The onetime girlfriend of Mark Choose, who’s alleged by Christine Blasey Ford to have been current whereas Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her within the 1980s, has emerged as a pivotal if hidden determine on this entire affair — and now she’s ready to talk to the FBI and the Judiciary Committee about what she is aware of, in line with a letter from her lawyer that I’ve obtained.

Choose’s faculty girlfriend, Elizabeth Rasor, is represented by lawyer Roberta Kaplan, who despatched a letter to the Judiciary Committee at this time. The letter, which was supplied to me by a senior Senate Democratic aide on the committee, says that Rasor “would welcome the chance” to talk to “brokers of the FBI as a part of a reopened background investigation” into Kavanaugh’s conduct.

After Ford alleged to The Submit that Kavanaugh and Choose had assaulted her — one thing Kavanaugh and Choose have each denied — Rasor and what she is aware of turned a topic of curiosity on this entire affair when she spoke to the New Yorker. In that piece — which was primarily in regards to the second Kavanaugh accuser, Deborah Ramirez, who claimed Kavanaugh uncovered himself to her at Yale within the 1980s — Rasor didn’t make any allegations about Kavanaugh.

However Rasor did say that Choose had confided in her a couple of group intercourse incident on the time. Because the New Yorker piece put it:

Rasor recalled that Choose had instructed her ashamedly of an incident that concerned him and different boys taking turns having intercourse with a drunk lady. Rasor mentioned that Choose appeared to treat it as absolutely consensual. She mentioned that Choose didn’t identify others concerned within the incident, and she or he has no data that Kavanaugh participated in it.

The letter from Rasor’s lawyer confirms that this account faithfully displays what she remembers — and, now, what she is ready to inform the FBI. The letter says:

Ms. Rasor’s recollection of what occurred is said precisely within the New Yorker piece and she or he would welcome the chance to share this data with brokers of the FBI as a part of a re-opened background investigation.

In recounting this explicit episode to the New Yorker, Rasor didn’t identify Kavanaugh.

However Choose’s function — and no matter Rasor is ready to say about it — has all of the sudden taken on much more potential significance, now that lawyer Michael Avenatti has produced a sworn assertion from a 3rd lady, which claims that Choose did conspire with Kavanaugh to get girls drunk so that they could possibly be assaulted by quite a few younger males.

Because the assertion from Avenatti’s consumer, Julia Swetnick, put it, recounting incidents that sound just like the one Rasor recounted within the New Yorker:

I additionally witnessed efforts by Mark Choose, Brett Kavanaugh and others to trigger women to turn into inebriated and disoriented so they might then be ‘gang raped’ in a facet room or bed room by a ‘practice’ of quite a few boys. I’ve a agency recollection of seeing boys lined up exterior rooms and plenty of of those events ready for his or her ‘flip’ with a woman contained in the room. These boys included Mark Choose and Brett Kavanaugh. …

In roughly 1982, I turned the sufferer of one among these ‘gang’ or ‘practice’ rapes the place Mark Choose and Brett Kavanaugh have been current. … I consider I used to be drugged utilizing Quaaludes or one thing comparable positioned in what I used to be ingesting.

The New Yorker piece quotes Rasor saying Choose confessed to an analogous episode, however with out implicating Kavanaugh in it.

The letter from Rasor’s lawyer doesn’t handle this separate set of allegations from this third lady, and it’s unclear whether or not she’d be keen to deal with them. So it’s doable, if this extra lady’s account is fake, that Rasor would possibly find yourself failing to verify it or saying that she is aware of nothing of those explicit episodes that are alleged to have additionally concerned Kavanaugh.

Nonetheless, Democrats are more likely to cite Rasor’s willingness to share what she is aware of to extend the strain on Judiciary Committee Republicans to name for a re-opened FBI investigation or, barring that, to permit her to talk to the Committee.

“Ms. Rasor’s assertion that Mark Choose instructed her about his participation in a gang rape when he was in highschool is highly effective corroborating proof,” the senior Democratic aide to the Judiciary Committee instructed me. “She is keen to cooperate with the Judiciary Committee and the FBI.” The aide added that this raises additional questions on why “Mark Choose is hiding out in Bethany Seashore and Republicans refuse to name him as a witness.”

It’s not clear whether or not Kavanaugh would in the end be implicated even when Rasor did testify, however her willingness to take action does spotlight simply how restricted the listening to — at which solely Ford and Kavanaugh are anticipated to testify — is shaping as much as be.

Rasor can also be keen to talk to the listening to, if Republicans don’t name for a reopened FBI background examine, her lawyer’s letter says. “Though Ms. Rasor doesn’t welcome the undesirable consideration that will inevitably consequence if she have been to testify earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee,” it says, “she believes that it’s her obligation as a citizen to inform the reality about what occurred.”

Rasor’s willingness to talk would additionally appear to extend strain on Republicans to subpoena Choose to testify, although there’s no indication that they may give floor on that time.

Learn extra:

Explosive new allegations towards Kavanaugh demand a full investigation — now

Nobody appears to have the nerve to finish this

Christine Blasey Ford can management Thursday’s listening to

‘The Voice’ premiere: This 13-year-old contestant made the judges lose their minds


Kennedy Holmes after her audition on the Season 15 premiere of “The Voice.” (Tyler Golden/NBC)

By now, seasoned viewers of actuality singing competitions know to pay particular consideration to the tip of any audition episode — producers usually save that slot for his or her favourite contestant. Certainly, in the previous couple of minutes of “The Voice” Season 15 premiere on Monday, the producers actually delivered.

“Let’s examine in with the ultimate artist of the evening,” host Carson Daly knowledgeable the viewers, and launched Kennedy Holmes, a 13-year-old from St. Louis.

A couple of minutes later, younger Holmes would make the movie star coaches/judges lose their minds. However first, viewers have been handled to a reasonably commonplace prerecorded introduction of Holmes, the youngest singer to audition this season. Holmes stated she’s a typical center faculty pupil: She loves dancing, taking part in volleyball, operating monitor and recording goofy movies within the automotive along with her mother.

Then, the producers lower to her standing on the stage. She began singing Adele’s “Turning Tables.” And she or he appeared like this:

Everybody freaked out over Holmes’s near-flawless efficiency. All 4 judges slammed their buttons so the chairs may spin round, they usually ready to battle it out to influence Holmes to affix their respective groups. Holmes’s mother and father and brother, standing to the facet of the stage, have been shocked.

The coveted “four-chair flip” on “The Voice” is one factor. However it’s extremely uncommon for a contestant to encourage such an intense response, significantly from jaded celebrities who’ve been on this present for years. After Kelly Clarkson actually needed to take a stroll to settle down after studying Holmes’s age, Adam Levine stated as a lot.

“Very, very hardly ever does somebody come round that form of reignites our ardour for what we do. And to listen to you sing at present did that,” Levine stated. “Simply to see that form of confidence naturally exist in you at such a younger age, it’s unparalleled. After the 15 seasons, you actually may change into absolutely the greatest factor to ever come from this present.”

Blake Shelton agreed. “Let me be the primary to thanks for coming to ‘The Voice,’ ’trigger our scores are going to shoot by means of the roof this night. I feel you’re the finest vocalist that has auditioned this yr,” he stated. “I need you to choose me as your coach so you may train me how one can sing like that.”

Clearly, the producers knew they’d one thing particular — every week earlier than the premiere, they launched a preview of Holmes’s audition, although they lower it off when she was about to decide on her coach.

The selection was apparent: Holmes, remarkably poised by means of her audition, burst into tears as quickly as Jennifer Hudson began speaking to her. Attempting to collect her composure, Holmes stated that in one among her first performances at college, she sang “I Am Altering,” which Hudson’s character carried out in “Dreamgirls.”

“I’ve dreamed to sing with you,” Holmes stated.

“I’m prepared!” Hudson replied. She walked to the stage and gave Holmes a hug, and the 2 of them sang a short, impromptu efficiency of “I Am Altering.” Holmes’s mother and father — and Clarkson — began crying.

“It was an honor and a pleasure simply to sing with you,” Hudson stated.

Clearly, Holmes selected Hudson as her coach. Hudson was thrilled. “I feel the sport is over as a result of I simply gained ‘The Voice’ with little Miss Kennedy. Sure, I did,” she stated triumphantly.

The opposite coaches didn’t argue. “You win. It’s over,” Levine stated.

“She’s so good,” Clarkson added.

Shelton, a six-time winner, concurred: “You simply gained ‘The Voice.’ ”

Learn extra:

Florida Georgia Line may have been a one-hit marvel. As a substitute, they constructed an empire.

‘The Voice’ launched Danielle Bradbery’s music profession. Then she needed to discover her personal path.

Carrie Underwood’s new album isn’t political. However right here’s why it nonetheless makes an announcement.